mockingbirds
Why supporting Ron Paul is backwards

stfuconservatives:

gop-circus:

Ron Paul is racist, or at the very least, allowed racist literature to be published under his name. But to me, this isn’t the worst part about Paul as a candidate - His stances on civil liberties and economic issues when it comes to state’s rights are scary. And his supporters who type in all caps and hail him as christ reborn are even worse because they believe that his ‘policy ideas’ could actually help our country.

Anyone considering Paul as a candidate should certainly take into account his views on race, gender and the LGBT community (which are all awful) but they should also take into account the large amount of other issues in which he is not only incredibly wrong, but where his policy prescriptions would make things worse. Some Occupy Wall Street supporters are Paul supporters, but Paul is associated with the 1 percent, despite what his supporters yell about all over the internet.  He says some things that sound good, but his voting record on issues related to corporations and the rest of us is not so good—-

  • Aid to Less Advantaged People, at Home & Abroad is 13.40 percent progressive
  • Corporate Subsidies 31.18 percent
  • Education, Humanities, & the Arts 13.19 percent
  • Environment 11.35 percent
  • Fair Taxation 9.01 percent
  • Government Checks on Corporate Power 15.16 percent
  • Health Care 12.62 percent
  • Housing 6.10 percent
  • Labor Rights 13.51 percent
  • Making Government Work for Everyone, Not Just the Rich or Powerful 15.88 percent

    Even on the issues he’s supposed to be good on, his record is lackluster:

  • Human Rights & Civil Liberties 33.66 percent progressive
  • Justice for All: Civil and Criminal 30.71 percent
  • War & Peace 47.92 percent

    Even when it comes to foreign policy, Paul still votes the wrong way more than half the time. He does have a better record than most Republicans on these issues, but even the most conservative of Democrats do better than Paul on almost every issue.

    To get a full handle on how bad Paul’s record and positions are, here is a quick rundown of his most offensive positions, those that would be the most damaging to the country.

  • Would abolish the income tax
  • Would place the U.S. on the gold standard
  • Would allow citizens to engage in trade using gold and silver instead of currency
  • Would arbitrarily cut government regulations and believes that regulations only hurt businesses
  • Would eliminate the taxation of foreign income
  • Is a global warming denier
  • Says that Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare are unconstitutional
  • Would eliminate antitrust laws
  • Would eliminate the federal minimum wage
  • Would eliminate the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Act
  • Would eliminate the estate and gift taxes
  • Would tax all earners at a 10 percent rate
  • Would eliminate tax credits to individuals who are not corporations
  • Would eliminate the elderly tax credit, child care credit and earned income credit
  • Voted to make it easier to decertify unions
  • Opposes Federal Deposit Insurance
  • Would revert government spending to 2004 levels and freeze it there
  • Opposes raising the debt ceiling for any reason
  • Would allow people to opt out of Social Security
  • Says that widespread bankruptcy is the stimulus the country needs
  • Opposed the auto industry bailouts
  • Favors tort reform
  • Opposes the regulation of tobacco
  • Would protect the ‘privacy’ of online sexual predators and child pornographers on public wi-fi networks
  • Would prevent federal courts from protecting citizens who have their rights denied
  • Opposed the Motor Voter law
  • Would allow states to ban gay marriage
  • Sponsored the Marriage Protection Act
  • Would repeal affirmative action
  • Would limit the scope of Brown v. Board of Education
  • Says that emergency rooms should be able to turn away undocumented immigrants
  • Opposes the Americans With Disabilities Act
  • Voted anti-choice more than 90 times as a member of Congress
  • Voted to eliminate all international family planning funds
  • Voted for the Stupak amendment banning abortion coverage by private health insurance companies
  • Voted in favor of fetal personhood laws
  • Would eliminate all funding for Planned Parenthood
  • Would ban flag burning
  • Would weaken regulation of dietary supplements
  • Supports a ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research
  • Opposes subsidies for prescription drugs for seniors
  • Opposes mandatory vaccinations
  • Would expand offshore oil drilling
  • Would increase mining on federal lands
  • Would weaken the Clean Air Act
  • Would repeal the Soil and Water Conservation Act
  • Would weaken the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
  • Would eliminate departments of Energy, Education, Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, and Labor
  • Would eliminate the Environmental Protection agency
  • Would eliminate FEMA
  • Would eliminate the Federal Reserve
  • Would eliminate the Occupational Health and Safety Administration
  • Would eliminate AmeriCorps
  • Would eliminate spending to combat AIDS overseas
  • Would eliminate gas taxes
  • Opposes the census gathering demographic data on Americans
  • Opposed the dismantling of U.S. nuclear missile silos
  • Wanted to withdraw the U.S. from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty
  • Wants to claim the Panama Canal as sovereign U.S. territory
  • Opposes the International Criminal Court
  • Would withdraw the U.S. from the U.N.
  • Supports the electoral college and believes that the U.S. is not a democracy
  • Believes that we have no right to health care
  • Would eliminate birthright citizenship
  • Believes that law enforcement can’t help people, only armed citizens can prevent violence
  • Would allow the legal sale of unpasteurized milk
  • Believes that groups of people don’t have rights, only individuals do
  • Believes that government cannot redistribute wealth in any way
  • Believes in the concept of ‘jury nullification’, the idea that a jury can judge not only the facts in a case but the justness of the law itself
  • Believes that social welfare should be in the hands of individuals only, not government

    Anyone that still thinks that a progressive vote for Paul is a legitimate vote has their head on sideways. Anyone that thinks that Paul “understands the Constitution” and is trying so hard to preserve it probably hasn’t even read the Constitution, or they are just plain confused.

  • Need to add this to my Ron Paul resource page.

    1. atbudokan reblogged this from charmless
    2. littleblackkittycat reblogged this from destroythegop
    3. deathcrush- reblogged this from gop-circus and added:
      I know I’ve posted...before. Re-posting
    4. seaa-legs reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    5. audiodopexx reblogged this from moniquill
    6. charmless reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    7. notyetread reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    8. bluebirdgirl reblogged this from karnythia
    9. exhibitor reblogged this from davosseaworthy
    10. whizzingfizzbees reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    11. trustme-imaninja reblogged this from eclectic-ellie
    12. levonsong reblogged this from firegrowshigher
    13. firegrowshigher reblogged this from pinkhairandbubblegum and added:
      Here you go, Panda.
    14. wustengrille reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
      It’s funny these are exactly the same reasons why I am voting for Dr. Paul. Also, how could he abolish income tax and...
    15. dirtymouf reblogged this from imanassspankme
    16. yourroyalrawrness reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    17. castawaykayla reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    18. thefabulousonna reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    19. yoctavias reblogged this from madgastronomer
    20. zackoak reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    21. shithappens-eatkale reblogged this from didyoueatallthisacid and added:
      implying that we should all vote newt ‘i cheated on my wife while she had cancer but i am a very trustworthy person so...
    22. teaandcrumpets reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    23. humboldtoctober reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    24. beardykraken reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    25. sassafras-gumdrops reblogged this from didyoueatallthisacid
    26. sillykarlyle reblogged this from pancakesandpokemon
    27. hoosierposter reblogged this from bluntlyblue
    28. krystallynsolid reblogged this from positiveconnotation and added:
      “Is a global warming denier.” Yeah, I stopped right goddamn there on that list. I knew he was a crazy old man, but now I...
    29. sxizzor reblogged this from moniquill
    30. reservoircat reblogged this from karnythia